Increased sense of ownership and responsibility: Since the members or owners are also the decision-makers, they have a stronger sense of ownership and responsibility towards the business.

More democratic decision-making: In a corporative society, decisions are made through a more democratic process, where all members have a say in the decision-making.

Greater accountability: Since the members or owners are also the decision-makers, they are more accountable for the decisions and actions of the business.

Improved workplace culture: A corporative society can foster a more positive workplace culture, as the members or owners are more likely to be invested in the well-being of the business and each other.

Increased innovation: With a more democratic decision-making process, a corporative society can encourage more innovative thinking and problem-solving.

Greater flexibility: A corporative society can be more flexible in terms of decision-making and management, as the members or owners can adapt the business model to changing circumstances.

Better social responsibility: A corporative society can be more socially responsible, as the members or owners are more likely to be invested in the community and the environment.

Improved employee morale: With a more participatory management style, a corporative society can improve employee morale and job satisfaction.

Increased profitability: By involving all members or owners in decision-making, a corporative society can make more informed and profitable business decisions.

Greater sense of community: A corporative society can create a stronger sense of community among its members or owners, as they work together towards a common goal.

Lack of expertise: Some members or owners may not have the necessary expertise or experience to make informed decisions.

Potential for conflict: With more members or owners involved in decision-making, there is a higher potential for conflict and disagreements.

Slower decision-making: With more members or owners to consult, decision-making can be slower and less efficient.

Difficulty in setting priorities: With more members or owners involved, it can be difficult to set priorities and focus on the most important issues.

Greater risk of bias: With more members or owners involved, there is a greater risk of bias and favoritism in decision-making.

Difficulty in holding individuals accountable: With more members or owners involved, it can be difficult to hold individuals accountable for their actions and decisions.

Greater risk of groupthink: With more members or owners involved, there is a greater risk of groupthink and a lack of critical thinking.

Difficulty in maintaining confidentiality: With more members or owners involved, it can be difficult to maintain confidentiality and protect sensitive information.

Greater risk of legal challenges: With more members or owners involved, there is a greater risk of legal challenges and liability.

Difficulty in scaling: With more members or owners involved, it can be difficult to scale the business and make decisions in a timely and efficient manner.